Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex Overton Overdone's avatar

This is great news, but far too few people in Canada even know what happened to the legal definition of Woman in 2017. Far too many are 100% clueless about the reality they are living in because they stick to a single news source. 😪

Expand full comment
Steersman's avatar

Encouraging news -- some more reasons to think the tide is turning.

Though I wonder what you and/or Amy Hamm mean by "biological sex". Too many people haven't progressed much past folk-biology or the Kindergarten Cop definitions -- boys (males) have penises and girls (females) have vaginas. Most people haven't a flaming clue what is actually meant by "biological sex".

The upshot of which is the erstwhile reputable biological journal "Cell" asking, apparently in all seriousness, "Is 'sex' a useful category?" ICYMI, my open letter to them objecting to their quite unscientific claptrap:

https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/is-sex-a-useful-category

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts